Market

Reference

170 tracked apps · United States · All stores.

Top Reference apps View in Discover

Apps tracked

Observed

170167 with revenue estimates

Median opportunity score

AI-derived

110 breakouts (80+)

Median growth

—no growth history yet

Openness

AI-derived

30of 100 · higher = less competition

Entry readAI-derived

1 vulnerable incumbent earns $10K+/mo (est.) with a rating under 4.0 — users are paying for products they dislike.
The category is crowded: median openness is only 30/100, so expect strong incumbents and costly acquisition.
Revenue is top-heavy: the top earner makes about 29× the median app ($53K vs $1.8K/mo, est.).
74 hidden gems rate 4.0+ with below-median traction — quality alone has not won distribution here.

Observedstore facts
Estimatedmodelled ranges
AI-derivedanalysis

Revenue distributionEstimated

Estimated monthly revenue (range midpoints) across the 167 of 170 apps with estimates.

Top earner: $53K/mo
90th percentile: $8.8K/mo
75th percentile: $3.4K/mo
Median: $1.8K/mo
25th percentile: $1.1K/mo

Revenue tiersEstimated

Apps per estimated monthly revenue tier.

32Micro · 19%
121Small · 73%
14Medium · 8%

Under $100 $0–$100: 0
Micro $100–$1K: 32
Small $1K–$10K: 121
Medium $10K–$100K: 14
Large $100K–$1M: 0
Mega $1M+: 0
No estimate: 3

Pricing model mixObserved

Listed pricing structure.

84Paid · 49%
86Unknown · 51%

Median monthly plan—no app lists a monthly price

Market movers

Largest growth changes in this category (90 days, or the history available).

Top gainers

No app is growing yet.

Top decliners

No app is declining.

Competitive positioningAI-derived

Traction against rating. Vulnerable incumbents — high traction, rated under 4.0 — are where users pay for products they dislike.

Traction: estimated monthly revenue (midpoint)Estimated· RatingObserved· Split at the category median ($1.8K/mo) and 4.0. 3 apps lack the data to be placed.